OpenAI's new Deep Research is creepy in a scary way. Effectively it becomes like your own personal FBI agent or private investigator.

Exhibit A: Joscha Bach’s Perspective on Elon Musk

“Joscha Bach’s Perspective on Elon Musk” (A deep research report from ChatGPT)

Early Praise: Musk as a Visionary “Hero”

Joscha Bach has at times cast Elon Musk in a positive, even heroic light. For example, in a March 2022 tweet Bach remarked that “Elon Musk and Gary Marcus are the prototypical hero and villain of an Ayn Rand novel. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it, they are so perfect.”​ x.com.

This colorful comparison positions Musk as the bold, visionary hero (with AI critic Gary Marcus as the opposing “villain”), suggesting Bach admired or at least playfully acknowledged Musk’s larger-than-life role in tech. Around the same time, Bach sided with Musk in debates on artificial intelligence progress; he quoted Gary Marcus’s claim that “Deep Learning is hitting a wall” to highlight the contrast between Marcus’s pessimism and Musk’s more optimistic, adventurous outlook​ x.com. These early public comments indicate a favorable inclination toward Musk’s ambitions – framing him as a Randian hero-innovator challenging establishment naysayers.

Bach has also noted Musk’s independent, iconoclastic streak in a positive way. In one tweet, he observed that figures like Elon Musk (and scientist Stephen Wolfram) “are autonomous individuals who fundamentally reject the [norms]…” – implying that Musk’s refusal to conform is a defining strength (context: a tweet on X highlighting Musk’s maverick mindset). Bach seems to appreciate Musk’s mold-breaking leadership, seeing him as someone willing to defy conventional wisdom to pursue big goals (be it electric cars, rockets, or AI). This admiration for Musk’s first-principles thinking and boldness aligns with Bach’s own interest in visionary ideas.

Criticism of Musk’s Twitter Leadership

Despite his admiration for Musk’s vision, Joscha Bach has openly criticized some of Musk’s decisions and behavior, especially regarding Twitter (now X) after Musk took over in 2022. In an August 2023 interview on the Lex Fridman Podcast, Bach expressed disappointment in how Musk handled the platform. He confessed, “I really regret that Twitter has not taken the turn that I was hoping for. I thought Elon [understood] that this thing needs to self-organize… so Twitter can become sentient”​ lexfridman.com. Here, Bach reveals he initially hoped Musk would transform Twitter into a kind of “global brain” – a self-organizing, intelligent network – but this didn’t happen. He attributed the failure partly to external pressures on Musk and to Musk’s own missteps: “many of the decisions that he made under this pressure [seemed] not very wise” lexfridman.com.

One specific action Bach took issue with was Musk’s approach to free speech on Twitter. He argued that Musk made a mistake by personally intervening in content moderation, noting it was “completely counter to any idea of free speech” for Musk to block users just for posting a link to a rival platform​ lexfridman.com. (This refers to an incident where Twitter temporarily suspended accounts for sharing Mastodon links, including a prominent figure’s account.) Bach commented that seeing Musk do this showed him Elon “was way less principled in his thinking [than expected]” and that Musk’s experiments in running a social media company often backfired because “things that he is trying…pan out very differently in a digital society than…in a car company”​ lexfridman.com. In other words, Bach believes Musk didn’t fully grasp the unique responsibilities of managing a global communication platform versus a traditional business.

Bach used a striking metaphor to underscore Musk’s underestimation of Twitter’s societal role. He said it’s “regrettable that this guy is able to become de facto the Pope… Twitter has more active members than the Catholic Church and [Musk] doesn’t get it”, meaning Musk didn’t realize the power and responsibility he held over public discourse​ lexfridman.com. According to Bach, Musk had the potential to foster a new kind of digital public square or “civilized society” online, but his capricious leadership style kept that from materializing. This critique shows an unfavorable view of Musk’s performance as Twitter’s steward: Bach essentially faulted Musk for short-sightedness and inconsistency, especially given Musk’s stated free-speech ideals.

It’s worth noting that Bach delivered these critiques in a thoughtful tone – he wasn’t engaging in personal attacks, but rather analyzing Musk’s leadership philosophically. He acknowledged that external pressures (financial and social) constrained what Musk could do with Twitter​

lexfridman.com. Nonetheless, the net impression from Bach’s 2023 commentary is that he was let down by Musk’s handling of the platform, having initially expected more visionary changes. This marks a more critical turn in Bach’s public opinion of Elon Musk compared to his earlier enthusiasm.

Acknowledging Successes and Pushing Back on Critics

Even as he critiques some of Musk’s actions, Joscha Bach also gives credit where it’s due and sometimes defends Musk against what he perceives as unfair criticism. For instance, Bach has highlighted the operational successes under Musk’s leadership at Twitter/X. In a February 2024 tweet, he pointed out that despite an advertiser boycott cutting revenue in half, Musk’s aggressive reorganization had doubled the company’s earnings (profitability): “Due to the advertiser boycott, X has only half the revenue of Twitter before Elon Musk. But due to his reorganization, it has twice the earnings.”​

x.com. By noting this financial turnaround, Bach acknowledges Musk’s effectiveness at streamlining the company. This suggests a favorable view of Musk’s managerial efficiency – he credits Musk for reducing costs and keeping the platform financially afloat against odds. It’s a more pragmatic praise, focusing on results rather than ideology.

Bach has also shown willingness to push back against excessive or irrational criticism of Elon Musk. In a tongue-in-cheek remark on X, he mocked extreme Musk detractors by writing, “tfw you hate Elon Musk so much that you are willing to pretend Tim Cook is better for Apple than Steve Jobs.”​

twitter.com. This quip implies that some people’s dislike of Musk is so intense that it skews their judgment (since claiming Tim Cook outshines Steve Jobs at Apple just to spite Musk is portrayed as absurd). By satirizing this, Bach positions himself against knee-jerk anti-Musk bias. He appears to be saying: let’s be fair – don’t let dislike of Musk cloud objective assessment. Similarly, Bach has commented on the political backlash Musk faces. Notably, he observed that “at this point it’s Elon Musk and the [U.S.] Democrats both being hell-bent on bringing each other down” (context: a late-2022 tweet amid clashes between Musk and certain political figures). This framing suggests Bach sees a two-sided feud rather than villainizing Musk alone. In essence, he often provides nuance and balance when discussing controversies around Musk, rather than dogpiling on him.

Additionally, Bach seems to appreciate Musk’s intentions even if he critiques the execution. In the Lex Fridman discussion, while lamenting Twitter’s trajectory, Bach still spoke of Musk’s potential to “create something lasting in society” with a truly self-organizing network​ lexfridman.com – indicating he believes Musk had the right big-picture idea (and perhaps could yet achieve it with different choices). This balanced acknowledgment — recognizing Musk’s vision and successes while also pointing out failures — exemplifies Bach’s mixed stance.

Overall Nuanced Stance

Considering Bach’s public statements in aggregate, his view of Elon Musk comes across as…

Some of the content is free, some of it is for paid subscribers only. It’s cheap to become a subscriber so join today, while there is not much more to read in this article, but if this article was joke the punchline would be at the end.